d the bulk of theirresearch.) In support of their cause, Goodrich counsel foundthat Ellis had said, in connection with trade-secrets cases inwhich the defendant was a company accused of luring awayanother company’s confidential employee: “Where theconfidential employee left to enter defendant’s employment, aninference can be drawn to supplement other circumstantialevidence that the latter employment was stimulated by a desireby the defendant to learn plaintiff’s secrets.”
In other words, 杭州洗浴小姐性息 Ellis apparently felt that when thecircumstances look suspicious, one free bite is not permitted.
Whether he contradicted himself or merely refined his positionis a nice question; Ellis himself had died several years earlier,so it was not possible to
consult him on the matter.
On February 20th, 1963, having studied the 杭州桑拿论坛蒲友交流 briefs anddeliberated on them, Judge Harvey delivered his decision, in theform of a nine-page essay fraught with suspense. To beginwith, the Judge wrote, he was convinced that Goodrich didhave trade secrets relative to space suits, and that Wohlgemuthmight be able to remember and therefore be able to disclosesome of them to Latex, to the irreparable injury of Goodrich.
He declared, further, that “there isn’t any doubt that the Latexcompany was attempting to gain [Wohlgemuth’s] valuableexperience in this particular 杭州哪有丝袜会所 specialized field for the reason thatthey had this so-called ‘Apollo’ contract with the government,and there isn’t any doubt that if he is permitted to work inthe space-suit division of the Latex company … he would havean opportunity to disclose confidential information of the B. F.
Goodrich Company.” Still further, Judge Harvey was convincedby the attitude of Latex, as this was evidenced by the conductof its representatives in court, that the company intended to tryto get Wohlgemuth to give it “the benefit of every kind 杭州大型水疗会所 ofinformation he had.” At this point in the opinion, thingscertainly looked black for the defense. However—and the Judgewas well down page 6 before he got to the “however”—whathe had concluded after studying the one-free-bite controversyamong the lawyers was that an injunction cannot be issuedagainst disclosure of trade 杭州特殊的男士spa secrets before such disclosure hasoccurred unless there is clear and substantial evidence of evilintent on the part of the defendant. The defendant in this case,the Judge pointed out, was Wohlgemuth, and if any evil intentwas involved, it appeared to be attributable to Latex ratherthan to him. For this reason, along with some technical ones,he wound up, “It is the view and the Order of this Court thatInjunction be denied against the defendant.”
Goodrich promptly appealed the decision, and the SummitCounty Court of Appeals, 杭州龙凤论坛贵族宝贝 pending its own decision on the case,issued another restraining order, which differed from JudgeHarvey’s in that it permitted Wohlgemuth to do space-suit workfor Latex, but still forbade him to disclose Goodrich’s allegedtrade secrets. Accordingly, Wohlgemuth, with an initial
victoryunder his belt but with a new legal 杭州龙凤娱乐地图论坛 struggle on his behalfahead, went